The Flexible Packaging Association (FPA) has formed its new Brand Owner Council and welcomed its inaugural members: Kraft Heinz, PepsiCo and Procter & Gamble. The council will bring together brand owners, converters and suppliers to address shared challenges and advance innovation across the flexible packaging value chain, giving the world’s largest consumer brands a direct voice in how the format evolves over the coming decade.
The Brand Owner Council is a new membership category within FPA designed to give brand owners a direct voice in shaping the future of flexible packaging. The council will create opportunities for shared learning among brand owners, flexible packaging converters, suppliers and policymakers on the issues that most directly impact packaging innovation, sustainability and business growth. By seating brands alongside the converters and material suppliers who actually make the packs, FPA is trying to close the gap between what a brand specifies and what the supply chain can deliver at scale and at cost.
As consumer expectations, sustainability goals and regulatory requirements continue to evolve, flexible packaging remains at the forefront of packaging innovation. Offering one of the most resource-efficient packaging formats and among the lowest carbon footprints of major packaging options, flexible packaging plays a critical role in helping companies meet both environmental and performance objectives. Brands increasingly favour it for the product-to-package ratio, the shelf-life extension it enables, and the freight savings from lighter weight — all of which feed directly into corporate emissions targets.
The Brand Owner Council was established to strengthen engagement across the packaging value chain, giving industry leaders a platform to share insights, address emerging challenges and identify opportunities to advance the use and performance of flexible packaging. Key areas of focus include helping to advance flexible packaging circularity, design innovation, and sustainability initiatives; supporting consumer education on the environmental benefits and circularity potential of flexible packaging; and integrating a collective brand owner perspective to elevate and strengthen FPA’s advocacy and public policy efforts at a time when packaging law is tightening fast.
‘The launch of the Brand Owner Council marks an important milestone for FPA and the flexible packaging industry,’ said Dan Felton, FPA president and CEO. ‘By bringing together leading consumer brands with packaging manufacturers and suppliers, we are creating a powerful forum for thought leadership that will help drive innovation, support sustainability goals and better position the industry for future growth.’ Felton’s framing matters because flexible packaging’s weakest point — recyclability of multi-material films — is precisely where coordinated brand-and-supplier action is needed to move the needle.
FPA expects the Brand Owner Council to continue growing as additional companies join the effort to advance packaging innovation, accelerate sustainability progress and strengthen collaboration across the flexible packaging value chain. The presence of three giants as founding members signals that brand-led circularity commitments are no longer optional rhetoric but procurement criteria that converters must meet to stay on approved supplier lists, which in turn pulls the entire materials and machinery base toward mono-material and reusable designs.
For converters, the council is both opportunity and pressure. On one hand, direct access to brand sustainability teams helps them align R&D with real briefs rather than guessing. On the other, the same brands are setting demanding reuse and recycled-content targets that can disrupt established laminate architectures. The practical effect is a faster migration toward recyclable mono-materials, allied with digital watermarking and improved sortation, as the value chain attempts to keep flexible packaging’s efficiency advantage while answering the criticism that it is hard to recycle.
The launch reflects a broader realignment in packaging governance, where brand owners — not converters or legislators alone — are setting the pace. By organising that influence inside a single association, FPA gives the flexible packaging sector a coordinated voice on public policy and a shared engine for innovation, which should help the format defend its environmental case with data rather than slogans as regulators and consumers alike demand proof that flexible packaging can be both efficient and circular.
The council’s formation also reflects hard economics. Flexible packaging’s share of the consumer-goods market has grown for years precisely because it is light, cheap to ship and protective of product — yet its multi-material laminates have drawn regulatory fire over recyclability. By seating the brands that specify those laminates at the same table as the converters who make them and the suppliers who invent the materials, FPA is trying to solve the recyclability problem collaboratively rather than through adversarial legislation. A mono-material pouch that a brand will actually buy is worth more than a perfectly recyclable film nobody specifies, and the council’s brand members bring the commercial pull to make greener formats viable at scale.
For policymakers, the council is a useful counterpart. Rather than facing a fragmented industry, regulators and legislators can engage a body that speaks for brands, converters and suppliers in one voice, with real data on environmental performance. That coordinated advocacy is more likely to produce workable rules than a patchwork of conflicting national measures, and it gives flexible packaging a fighting chance to keep its efficiency advantages under law. As Felton noted, the milestone is less the founding itself than the precedent it sets: brand owners formally inside the tent, shaping the format’s future rather than merely reacting to it from the outside.

中文
